FOIA Annual Report Workbook2011-10-24FOIA Annual ReportNARANational Archives & Records Administration201141 U.S.C. 253(b)(m)(1)Contractor proposals that are in the possession or control of an executive agency and that have not been set forth or incorporated by reference into contracts.Margolin v. NASA, No. 09-CV-00421-LRH-VPC, 2011 WL 1303221, at *6 (D. Nev. Mar 31, 2011); Hornbostel v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 305 F. Supp. 2d 21, 30 (D.D.C. 2003), summary affirmance granted, No. 03-5257, 2004 WL 1900562 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 25, 2004).42 U.S.C. 2162 (Atomic Energy Act)"Restricted Data" pertaining to atomic weapons and special nuclear material.Meeropol v. Smith, No. 75-1121, slip op. at 53-55 (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1984), aff'd in relevant part & remanded in part on other grounds sub nom, Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942 (D.C. Cir. 1986).42 U.S.C. 2168(a)(1)(c) (FRD)Restricted and Formerly Restricted Data (Atomic Energy Act of 1954)Meeropol v. Smith, No. 75-1121, slip op. at 53-55 (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1984), aff'd in relevant part & remanded in part on other grounds sub nom, Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942 (D.C. Cir. 1986).50 U.S.C. 403(g) (CIA Act of 1949)Intelligence sources and methods; certain information pertaining to Agency employees, specifically: "the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency"Larson v. Dep't of State, 565 F.3d 857, 865 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Berman v. CIA, 501 F.3d 1136, 1137-38, 1140 (9th Cir. 2007); Makky v. Chertoff, 489 F. Supp. 2d 421, 442 (D.N.J. 2007), aff'd on other grounds, 541 F.3d 205 (3d Cir. 2008).50 U.S.C. 421 (Intelligence Identies Protection Act of 1982)Identies of US Undercover Intelligence Officers, Agents, Informants and SourcesNoneFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), enacted by Act of July 30, 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-78, 91 Stat. 319Certain records pertining to grand jury proceedings.Sussman v. USMS, 494 F.3d 1106, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 656 F.2d 856, 867-68 (D.C. Cir. 1981); Durham v. U.S. Atty. Gen., No. 06-843, 2008 WL 620744, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2008); Cozen O'Connor v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, 570 F. Supp. 2d 749, 776 (E.D. Pa. 2008).22124117064181291718280113951756NoRecords16201Referred61Withdrawn28FeeRelated5NotDescribed54ImproperRequest47NotAgency9Duplicate20Other18117182Presidential Records Act11Requests illegible, or other instances not properly covered by procedural denials a - h170181Ex. 186Ex. 224Ex. 373Ex. 416Ex. 547Ex. 6103Ex. 7(A)9Ex. 7(C)23Ex. 7(D)5Ex. 7(E)2666664835911964Ex. 35Ex. 41Ex. 55Ex. 66Ex. 7(C)5Ex. 7(D)2Ex. 7(E)2Ex. 7(F)1NoRecords12Withdrawn1FeeRelated8NotDescribed1ImproperRequest10Other3Records are open and available for use in the Agency's public research room.2Appeal moot after agency responded while appeal was adjudicated.13182833322008-06-248222009-12-294432011-01-041892011-04-281092011-09-08172011-09-2092011-09-2742011-09-2747th oldest appeal adjudicated October 7, 2011.8th oldest appeal adjudicated October 25, 2011.410.5017532038204327At this time, NARA's data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion. We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2012 Annual Report.12120.80149423.547504327At this time, NARA's data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion. We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2012 Annual Report.1-201559021-4054341-6015061-805481-10029101-12017121-14016141-16013161-1809181-2007201-30017301-40013401+111165691-2026121-404741-601261-80881-1003101-1206121-1403141-1605161-1804181-2002201-30017301-40020401+2256131-20021-40041-60061-80081-1000101-1200121-1400141-1600161-1800181-2000201-3000301-4000401+00At this time, NARA's data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion. We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2012 Annual Report.2162451805.23489810151269.30At this time, NARA's data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the lifecycle to completion. We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2011 Annual Report.1992-09-2847701992-10-0547651993-01-1446971993-05-0346221993-05-3146031993-06-3045811993-07-2045681993-08-0245601993-09-0945321993-10-174506612551879255036363162915031629156070.000280118000015781181291557317182706480113966376468NARA identified 2 appeals that had been officially closed in FY 10, but still were listed as "open" when the FY 10 report was compiled. Therefore, the correct number of backlogged appeals should have been listed as 6 instead of 8.