FOIA Annual Report Workbook2012-11-06FOIA Annual ReportNARANational Archives and Records Administration20125 U.S.C. 574(j) - Alternative Dispute Resolution ActDispute-resolution communications between a party and a neutral.None8 U.S.C. 1202(f) - Immigration and Nationality ActCertain records pertaining to the issuance or refusal of visas to enter the United States.Medina-Hincapie v. Dep't of State, 700 F.2d 737, 741-42 (D.C. Cir. 1983); DeLaurentiis v. Haig, 686 F.2d 192, 194 (3d Cir. 1982); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of State, 650 F. Supp. 2d 28, 33 (D.D.C. 2009); Smith v. DOJ, No. 81-CV-813, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10878, at *13-14 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 1983).10 U.S.C. 424Organization or any function of, and certain information pertaining to, employees of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office,and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.Physicians for Human Rights v. DOD, No. RDB-08-273, 2011 WL 1495942, at *7 (D.D.C. Apr. 19, 2011); Miller v. DOJ, 562 F. Supp. 2d 82, 112 (D.D.C. 2008); Wickwire Gavin, P.C. v. Def. Intelligence Agency, 330 F. Supp. 2d 592, 602 (E.D. Va. 2004).18 U.S.C. 2510-2520 - Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets ActWiretap requests and the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication obtained through wiretaps.Mendoza v. DEA, No. 07-5006, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22175 (D.C.Cir. Sept. 14, 2007)(per curiam); Lam Lek Chong v. DEA, 929 F.2d 729, 733 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Payne v. DOJ, No. 96-30840, slip op. at 5-6 (5th Cir. July 11, 1997).26 U.S.C. 6103, 6105 - Internal Revenue CodeCertain tax return information and certain tax convention information.Church of Scientology v. IRS, 484 U.S. 9, 15 (1987)(26 U.S.C. 6103); Pac. Fisheries, Inc. v. IRS, 395 F. App'x. 438, 440 (9th Cir. 2010)(unpublished disposition)(26 U.S.C. 6103, 6105); Tax Analysts v. IRS, 217 F. Supp. 2d 23, 27-29 (D.D.C. 2002) (26 U.S.C. 6105)41 U.S.C. 253(b)(m)(1)Contractor proposals that are in the possession or control of an executive agency and that have not been set forth or incorporated by reference into contracts.Sinkfield v. HUD, No. 10-885, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35233, at *13-15 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 15, 2012); Hornbostel v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 305 F. Supp. 2d 21, 30 (D.D.C. 2003), summary affirmance granted, No. 03-5257, 2004 WL 1900562 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 25, 2004).41 U.S.C. 423(a)(1) - Procurement Integrity ActContractor bid or proposal information; source selection information.Legal & Safety Employer Research, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Army, No. Civ. S001748, 2001 WL 34098652, at *3-4 (E.D. Cal. May 4, 2001)(dictum).42 U.S.C. 2162 - Atomic Energy Act"Restricted Data" pertaining to atomic weapons and special nuclear material.Meeropol v. Smith, No. 75-1121, slip op. at 53-55 (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1984), aff'd in relevant part & remanded in part on other grounds sub nom, Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942 (D.C. Cir. 1986).42 U.S.C. 2168(a)(1)(c) (FRD)Restricted and Formerly Restricted Data (Atomic Energy Act of 1954)Meeropol v. Smith, No. 75-1121, slip op. at 53-55 (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1984), aff'd in relevant part & remanded in part on other grounds sub nom, Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942 (D.C. Cir. 1986).50 U.S.C. 403-1(i)(1) - National Security Act of 1947Intelligence sources and methods.CIA v. Sims, 471 U.S. 159, 167 (1985); Berman v. CIA, 501 F.3d 1136, 1137-38, 1140 (9th Cir. 2007); Wolf v. CIA, 473 F.3d 370, 378, 380 (D.C.Cir. 2007).50 U.S.C. 403(g) - CIA Act of 1949Intelligence sources and methods; certain information pertaining to Agency employees, specifically: "the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency"Larson v. Dep't of State, 565 F.3d 857, 865 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Berman v. CIA, 501 F.3d 1136, 1137-38, 1140 (9th Cir. 2007); Makky v. Chertoff, 489 F. Supp. 2d 421, 442 (D.N.J. 2007), aff'd on other grounds, 541 F.3d 205 (3d Cir. 2008).50 U.S.C. 421(c) - Intelligence Identies Protection Act of 1982Identies of US Undercover Intelligence Officers, Agents, Informants and SourcesNoneFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), enacted by Act of July 30, 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-78, 91 Stat. 319Certain records pertaining to grand jury proceedings.Sussman v. USMS, 494 F.3d 1106, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 656 F.2d 856, 867-68 (D.C. Cir. 1981); Durham v. U.S. Atty. Gen., No. 06-843, 2008 WL 620744, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2008); Cozen O'Connor v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, 570 F. Supp. 2d 749, 776 (E.D. Pa. 2008).316152213112317801113345137467610117334829NoRecords11314Referred64Withdrawn46FeeRelated3NotDescribed43ImproperRequest50NotAgency38Duplicate61Other57713746Presidential Records Act15Requests illegible, or other instances not properly covered by procedural denials a - h562577Ex. 1178Ex. 264Ex. 3155Ex. 422Ex. 545Ex. 6180Ex. 7(A)4Ex. 7(C)83Ex. 7(D)52Ex. 7(E)70Ex. 7(F)56616074569060Ex. 12Ex. 34Ex. 55Ex. 64Ex. 7(C)1Ex. 7(D)2Ex. 7(E)1NoRecords9FeeRelated8ImproperRequest9NotAgency4Duplicate1Other7Upheld the Search as reasonable under the FOIA6Electronic record not readily reproducible with redactions1718.537310402011-01-044382012-01-051872012-03-131412012-06-11782012-07-09592012-09-04192012-09-198657.50350935791704932810122At this time, NARA can only provide data for expedited processing of FOIA requests for our operational records. NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of FOIA requests for accessioned or Presidential records seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to these expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.474922.6035096091110049321612.5122At this time, NARA can only provide data for expedited processing of FOIA requests for our operational records. NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of FOIA requests for accessioned or Presidential records seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to these expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.1-201067621-4065041-6023561-803981-10020101-12015121-1409141-1604161-1806181-2007201-30012301-40010401+425121081-2038821-4012341-603961-803181-10016101-12016121-1409141-16010161-18012181-20014201-30088301-40065401+82416351-201621-40441-60061-80081-1000101-1200121-1400141-1600161-1800181-2000201-3000301-4000401+020At this time, NARA can only provide data for expedited processing of FOIA requests for our operational records. NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of FOIA requests for accessioned or Presidential records seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to these expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.2098415685.1542301001.51293.225454At this time, NARA can only provide data for expedited processing of FOIA requests for our operational records. NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of FOIA requests for accessioned or Presidential records seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to these expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.1992-09-0250631992-10-0550411993-08-0348321993-08-3148121993-09-0948061993-10-0147901993-10-0147901993-10-0147901993-10-0147901993-10-104784NARA's General Counsel's Office and the National Declassification Center are undertaking an extensive review of the oldest FOIA requests still outstanding. These requests pre-date our current electrionic tracking system. As a result, we identified cases that were not previously reported in the Annual Report. Most of the oldest requests are "consultations" pending with other agencies for declassification review.2242.59.51835221803636307855303078553203.230.000176105000018129133451718213746801176106661646065