RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL  (TRP NOTES MAIL)

CREATOR: Elaine C. Kamarck ( CN=Elaine C. Kamarck/O=OVP [ OVP ] )

CREATION DATE/TIME:19-FEB-1997 18:04:41.00

SUBJECT:  POTUS lunch memo - February 19, 1997

TO: Wendy C. New ( CN=Wendy C. New/O=OVP @ OVP [ OVP ] )
READ:UNKNOWN

TEXT:
To:	Ron Klain/OVP, Debbie B Bengtson/OVP

cc:	 

From:	Elaine C. Kamarck/OVP

Date:	02/19/97 06:03:52 PM

Subject:	POTUS lunch memo - February 19, 1997



There are 3 issues for lunch -  one minor and two major; the minor one 

first.



	1) At your last lunch the President asked about Peter Drucker.  We 

did a Nexus-Lexis search on him and he has written nothing on NPR since 

the Atlantic Monthly cover article of nearly two years ago.  Prior to his 

writing that article he was briefed by an NPR team on what we were doing 

and wrote a somewhat negative article anyway.  He is now 90 years old and, 

as far as we can tell, not writing about anyone.  I think it may be well 

worth our while to brief other, younger management experts in order to get 

our story out but I don't think we need be too concerned about Drucker.



	2)  Rego in the second term.  As you know we are concentrating on 

31 agencies with the object of making sure they deliver reinvention 

results that are highly visible to the public in the next four years.  

(The list is attached.)  So far we have met with INS, PTO (Patent and 

Trademark), SBA and Customs.  By the end of June all these agencies will 

have ready for you a four year reinvention plan.  The cumulative goals of 

these plans -- for instance,  "The US should lead the creation of a one 

stop international Patent Filing system over the Internet." -- will  be 

something the President may want to join you in announcing.

	One of the interesting themes to emerge from at least two of the 

four (PTO and Customs) is significant micromanagment and not necessarily 

helpful interference on the part of the Cabinet Department in which they 

are located.  It is for this reason that you will be meeting with all the 

new Cabinet Secretaries and it is for this reason that the President 

should reinforce with his Cabinet Secretaries (especially the new ones) 

that he expects them to deliver on a significant reinvention agenda for 

the next four years.  If they hear this from him and from you we may get 

the new Secretaries to help, not hinder, the reinvention efforts of these 

very large bureaus under their control.



	3)  Your Role in the Administration's Education reform efforts.  

While the President focuses on standards and assesment you can compliment 

his efforts by talking about school system reform.  The essential facts 

are that the school population is rising as fast as it was in the 1960s 

but there is no political will to increase the dollars going to education 

in significant amounts.  That means that public education will need to be 

restructured, reinvented and reengineered just as we are doing in the rest 

of the government.  Research indicates that there is significant room to 

reinvent school spending in much the same way that we have reinvented 

government, by cutting unnecessary bureaucracy and overhead and by 

focusing money and resources on the "customer" -- in this case students 

and the people who deal directly with them.

	If you start with the fact that per pupil expenditures, adjusted 

for inflation, have risen more than 25% over the past 10 years with no 

apparent affect you know that there is alot of waste going on.  "Site 

based reporting" developed by Coopers and Lybrand has been applied to more 

than 50 school districts nationwide.  This breaks down school financing in 

ways that answer the critical question -- "How much is being spent on the 

child?"   Not surprisingly there appears to be a rough relationship 

between poor student performance in a school district and excessive 

bureaucracy.  In New York City they found that they were spending $8000 

per student but only $44 was being budgeted for classroom materials.  In 

Nashville, they discovered that they were spending 24% of their budget on 

operations and maintenance compared to 18% for a typical large district 

and they started a program to decrease those costs and increase the money 

for instructional spending. 

	These numbers are most dramatic in big cities.  Sunday's 

Washington Post carried a dramatic story about the District where they 

spend $7,389 per student and still wind up short on crayons, toilet paper, 

books and teachers.

	There are many more examples where school dollars are not being 

spent on the "customer."  I am arranging a briefing for you next week on 

this topic.  But this is exactly what we face in the federal government 

and what we have to change in a balanced budget era.  I believe you could 

be a great spokesman encouraging parents to hold their school districs 

accountable for every education dollar and that this would give you your 

own piece of the education debate.  You should broach this topic with the 

President and see if he is amenable to your going forward with this.