FY 2013 Grant Announcement (Initial):
Institute for Historical Editing
The National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), a part of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), supports projects that promote the preservation and use of America's documentary heritage essential to understanding our democracy, history, and culture.
The following grant application information is for a project to develop and administer an Institute for Historical Editing.
Funding Opportunity Number: EDITING-201303
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 89.003
NHPRC support begins no earlier than July 1, 2013.
The Institute for Historical Editing can consist of both basic and advanced institutes.
This program does not support requests from individuals for their own training, education, or professional advancement. Such requests will be ineligible.
For a comprehensive list of Commission's limitations on funding, please see What We Do and Do Not Fund.
A grant normally is for one to three years and up to $275,000. The Commission expects to make one grant in this category, for a total of up to $275,000.
The Commission requires that grant recipients acknowledge NHPRC grant assistance in all publications and other products that result from its support.
- Nonprofit organizations or institutions
- Colleges, universities, and other academic institutions
- State or local government agencies
- Federally-acknowledged or state-recognized Native American tribes or groups
Applicant organizations must be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) prior to submitting an application, maintain SAM registration throughout the application and award process, and include a valid DUNS number in their application. Details on SAM registration and requesting a DUNS number can be found at the System for Award Management website at http://sam.gov. Please refer to the User Guides section and the Grants Registrations PDF.
Ineligible applications will not be reviewed.
The Commission may support up to the entire direct costs of the project, not including program revenue. Cost sharing may include the program revenue, grantee's indirect costs, as well as any additional direct costs borne by the applicant.
Applicants should follow the instructions on how to fill out the online forms and apply electronically using the Application Instructions for information on how to fill out the application forms.
The National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC) requires that grant applications be submitted via Grants.gov. In the event that Grants.gov is experiencing technical difficulties that prevent submission, applicants must first attempt to resolve the issue with the Grants.gov Contact Center (800-518-4726). If Grants.gov cannot solve the problem, applicants may request an alternative. To make use of the NHPRC backup system, applicants must contact Jeff de la Concepcion (202-357-5022) no later than 3:00 Eastern Time on the day of the deadline with their valid Grants.gov Contact Center trouble-ticket number.
A complete application includes the Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424), Assurances -- Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B), a Project Narrative, Summary, Supplementary Materials, and Budget. Applications lacking these items will not be considered. In order to ensure eligibility, applicants should first review the Federal grant administration rules and regulations governing grants from the NHPRC listed in the Administering an NHPRC Grant section.
The Project Narrative is a description of the proposal. It should be no more than 20 double-spaced pages in 12-pt type on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with standard margins.
Please organize your narrative in sections:
- Describe your project's overall purpose and long-term goals. Be sure to identify explicitly the audiences for the Institute for Historical Editing and
explain the need for this type of professional development, including, if applicable, in the federal workforce. Refer to studies that have demonstrated the need for
this project. Explain how the project builds on your organization's professional knowledge, training, and experiences. This discussion should then lead to the
following: What topics do you plan to include in basic and advanced Institutes (if applicable)? How many hours will participants meet for how many days? What teaching
and training methods will you use to make these different types of Institutes effective, applicable, and accessible to the participants? What faculty do you plan to
recruit to teach these topics? Indicate the number and qualifications of the faculty you seek and name those individuals from whom you have received tentative
commitments. In your supplementary materials, include brief resumes from faculty and a draft schedule for each kind of training detailing the order of the topics and
the amount of time devoted to each issue.
- How will you advertise the Institute(s) to potential participants; how will they apply; and how will they be selected? What is your target number for
participants? Include a draft application form and an evaluation matrix in your supplementary materials. What, if any, projects will you expect participants to
complete before, during, and after the Institute and how will they be evaluated? What current technologies will you use to support all of these activities?
- How are the project director and other project staff qualified to develop and manage the Institute? Be specific about experiences in executive education and
training, as well as historical editing. In your supplementary materials, include resumes for all named staff on the application and position announcements for any
new positions to be paid for by grant funds.
- What is your schedule for developing and then implementing the Institute? Provide a detailed plan of work and timeline that outlines the steps necessary to develop
and run the Institute.
- Where do you expect to hold the Institute? Where will participants stay and eat during the course of the Institute? What fees do you expect to charge? How many and
what form of scholarships will you offer? Explain how the selected location(s) will increase the effectiveness of the experience for participants. If available,
include descriptions of the facilities and their costs in your supplementary materials.
- What evaluation methods will you use to assess the effectiveness of the Institute, including the participants' experience, faculty, facilities, and curriculum and
teaching methodologies? The Commission plans to fund the recipient for at least two Institutes starting in 2014, but expects the successful applicant to revise the
structure of the Institute as necessary in response to feedback after each Institute.
- List four to six quantifiable performance objectives that will allow you and the Commission to evaluate the project following the submission of the final report.
- Provide evidence of your institution's ability to follow the relevant federal financial and managements regulations if the project application were successful.
In particular, address the nature of your financial management system(s). Please note how the system(s) track actual grant and cost share expenses in comparison with
budgeted expenses. In addition, explain how your personnel and management systems track the amount of time staff and consultants would spend on this project.
Please attach the following Supplementary Materials to your Narrative:
- Résumés or curriculum vitae for all named staff on the application
- Position announcement for any new positions to be paid for by grant funds
- Draft schedule for the Institute
- Institute faculty's brief résumés (2 pages)
- Draft application form and an evaluation matrix for application evaluation
- Descriptions of the proposed facilities and their costs
If these materials are available on a web site, please provide a URL.
The Project Summary should be no more than 3 double-spaced pages in 12-pt type on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with standard margins, and it should include these sections:
- Project's Purpose and Significance
- Plan of Work for the Grant Period
- Products to be completed during the Grant Period
- Names, Titles, Institutions, Phone Numbers, and E-Mail Addresses of the Project Director and Key Personnel
Please ensure that the project director listed on this summary is the same person listed in Section 8 (f), of the SF 424. If your institution requires a different contact person on the SF 424, please explain in one sentence.
- Performance Objectives
You must submit a budget on the NHPRC Budget Form available on the Application Instructions page. Note that the form itself contains additional instructions. You may include with your application a narrative budget supplement for budget categories that require further detail. Provide specific budget figures, rounding to the nearest dollar.
Applicants will be asked to compute the project costs to be charged to grant funds as well as those that will be supported by the applicant through cost sharing, which includes both direct and indirect expenses, in-kind contributions, non-Federal third-party contributions, and any income earned directly by the project.
If the project expects program income, it should be allocated among specific budget categories on the cost-sharing column of the project budget. The total amount of expected program income should be reported on page 13 of the NHPRC budget form under "Project Funding for Entire Grant Period." The same amount should appear on the Application for Federal Assistance, SF424, item 18f. Please use the narrative budget supplement to explain the calculation of the expected income and its allocation.
All of the items listed, whether supported by grant funds or cost-sharing contributions, must be reasonable and necessary to accomplish project objectives, allowable in terms of the applicable federal cost principles, auditable, and incurred during the grant period. Applicants should review the appropriate Office of Management and Budget circulars on cost principles.
Charges to the project for items such as salaries, fringe benefits, travel, and contractual services must conform to the written policies and established practices of the applicant organization. In addition, successful applicants will be required to certify that they have adequate accounting and timekeeping procedures to meet the Federal requirements.
In preparing the budget, please follow the suggestions below in each of the categories:
Salaries: List each staff position and the full salary to be charged to the project and show the percentage of time each staff member will devote to the project. Indicate which positions are to be filled for the proposed project and which personnel are already on the staff of the applicant institution. Grant funds may be used to pay the salaries of only those individuals actually working on the project. You may count the time provided to the project by advisory board members.
Fringe Benefits: Include employee benefits using your organization's standard rates. No separate benefits should be included for positions that are computed at a daily rate or using honoraria.
Consultant Fees: Include payments for consultant services and honoraria. Provide justification for large or unusual consultant fees. Include consultant travel expenses in the "Travel" category.
Travel: Include transportation, lodging, and per diem expenses. The NHPRC does not fund staff travel to professional meetings unless the travel is essential to accomplish the goals of the project.
Supplies and Materials: Include routine office supplies and supplies ordinarily used in professional practices. Justify the cost of specialized materials and supplies in a supplemental budget narrative.
Services: Include the cost of duplication and printing, long-distance telephone, equipment leasing, postage, contracts with third parties, and other services that you are not including under other budget categories or as indirect-cost expenses. The costs of project activities to be undertaken by each third-party contractor should be included in this category as a single line item charge. Include a complete itemization of the costs in a supplemental budget narrative.
Other Costs: Include costs for necessary equipment above $5,000, stipends for participants in projects, and other items not included in previous grant categories. The NHPRC does not provide grant funds for the acquisition of routine equipment such as office furnishings and file cabinets, but we may allow for the purchase of archival equipment, such as shelving units, and technical equipment, such as computers and peripherals, essential for a project. Include technical specifications for equipment over $5,000 in a supplemental budget narrative.
- Draft (optional) Deadline: January 15, 2013
- Final Deadline: March 7, 2013
Applications must be submitted electronically by midnight Eastern Time on March 7, 2013.
NHPRC support begins no earlier than July 1, 2013.
Deadline Policy: Given that technical or administrative difficulties with Grants.gov may periodically delay the timely submission or receipt of applications, the Commission staff will make provisions for the receipt of such applications past the established deadline. Under these circumstances, applicants with technical or administrative issues related to Grants.gov must contact NHPRC staff as soon as possible, but no later than by 3:00 PM Eastern Time on the published application deadline. Applications that fail to meet deadlines for reasons other than those noted will not be considered for funding.
The NHPRC staff will acknowledge receipt of the application soon after we receive it. The following evaluation criteria and weights will be used by NHPRC staff and other reviewers to form recommendations:
- Ability of the project to develop the skills of historical editing professionals. (35 percent)
- Ability of the project to improve best practices in the training of historical editing professionals, and the transferability of these methods for wider use in the documentary editing community, including those who work in the federal government. (30 percent)
- Ability to complete the project's proposed objectives, judged by the qualifications of the staff and the reasonableness of the work plan and budget (including cost share). (25 percent)
- Effectiveness of the dissemination plans for the project's results. (15 percent)
Application Review Process
After submitting a proposal, do not discuss the pending application to the NHPRC with any Member of the Commission. Commission Members must ensure fair and equitable treatment of all applications and do not discuss proposals with individual applicants.
- Commission Staff
NHPRC staff evaluates the proposal and contacts the project director if there are any questions. Staff makes overall recommendations to the Commission and the Archivist based on the appropriateness of the project in meeting the Commission's goals; and the applicant's record of previous successful performance, on time reporting, and fiduciary responsibility (if applicable).
- The Commission
After reviewing proposals, the comments of peer reviewers, the applicants' responses to the reviews, and evaluations by the Commission staff, Commission members deliberate on proposals and make funding recommendations to the Archivist of the United States who, as Commission Chairman, has final statutory authority and selects award recipients. Throughout this process, all members of the Commission and its staff follow conflict-of-interest rules to assure fair and equal treatment of every application.
Grants are contingent upon available appropriated funds. In some cases, the Commission will adjust grant amounts depending upon the number of recommended proposals and total budget. The Commission may recommend to the Archivist to approve the proposal and extend an offer of a grant with applicable terms and conditions, or it may recommend rejection of the proposal.
Grant applicants will be notified within 2 weeks after the Archivist’s decision.
Applicants are encouraged to contact Lucy Barber, Deputy Executive Director, at 202-357-5306, or firstname.lastname@example.org. She can:
- Advise the applicant about the review process;
- Answer questions about what activities are eligible for support;
- Supply samples of successful applications;
- Read and comment on a preliminary draft. Applicants should submit a draft at least 1 month before the deadline.
For more information on how to comply with Federal regulations, see our Administering a Grant section.
* Please see our Privacy Statement